A couple of thoughts have been kicking around my mind today.
The first is that I need a more lateral approach to the sector plate idea, or else it is going to take up a disproportionate amount of space when the layout is assembled. I think the solution to this has been hiding from me in plain sight for the last few weeks. I think the way ahead lies with a combination of Jack Trollope's "fiddlestick" idea for a micro layout combined with the Iain Rice mini L girder sub base to produce a slide out section on which a sector plate can be mounted when the line is in use.At the moment I'm trying to avoid over complicating the design.
The other thought, having built one 4' x 2' baseboard is whether or not to build a layout that would just fit in that space as another stepping stone
My first thought was something like this.
It is based on an idea I had years ago for a OO9 layout based on Devils Bridge station on the VoR railway.. I've always like the idea of building a layout that provides a natural viewpoint that isn't square on and I think this plan might just work, with a 16" long traverser hidden by the bridge just long enough to take a pannier and a short bogie coach.
Having my half scale baseboard to hand I mocked up a N gauge version to see how the angles actually worked out.
Along the way I ended up with that very curvaceous backscene and a suspicion that the way to make it work would be to do away with points altogether and have two sector plates, with one short one accessed via a hole in the backscene hidden by the good shed, as it is on Apa Valley.
You know in N gauge that could fit into an Apa box.
In fact a little more experimentation this morning shows that in 4mm a Sentinel could fit on the short sector plate even on this 2ft by 1ft board
Moving from an OO gauge micro-layout to an EM gauge compromise, via a rather major diversion into both 7 1/4" gauge and minimal space OO9
Labels
Layout Design
Blodwell
Buildings
The Art of Compromise
Photography
Llanrhaiadr Mochnant
Scenery
Signal Box
Baseboards
Goods Yard
Track
45XX
Apa Box
EM
Lcut Creative
Travel
Backscene
Concepts
Railway Exhibitions
TVR
USA
Upwold
14XX
Anyrail
Bridge
Cuba
Cycling
Fencing
Lorry
Narrow Gauge
Point rodding
Points
Templot
Turnouts
West Maryland
Books
C+L
Fiddleyard
GWR
Hales
OO9
Phil Parker
Rolling Stock
Signals
State of the hobby
Tillig
Warley
Weighbridge
trams
2012
AC Railbus
Albion Yard
Allt-y-Graban Rd
Apa Valley
Balloch Pier
Bas
Bath Green Park
Brickwork
Bridgnorth
Bryn-y-Felin
CSX
Charmouth
Clarendon
Class 25
Cliff Railway
Coldrennick Road
Corris
Crich
DCC
Disused Railways
Dukedog
EMGS
Edwin Smith
Electrics
Emett
France
Gloucestershire & Warwickshire
HO
Hobbies
Hope under Dinmore
Hospital Gates
Iain Rice
Iliffe Stokes
Inspiration
Ireland
Kings Lynn
La Baraque
Lasercut
Leamington & Warwick
Locos
MSTS
Mainly Trains
Military Modeling
Mishaps
N guage
NEC
OOn3
Percy
Pier Railway
Porth y Waen
Preserved Railways
RTR
SMP
Seend
Sentinel
Sketchup
St Minions
Stockholm
TGV
TRAX
Tansey Bank
Techniques
Technology
Tim Horn
Trade
Trees
Ultrascale
Veldhoveh 1935
Watertank
Williamsport
diorama
manning wardle
painting
procrastination
pug
ships
simulators
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like your first idea much better. The two sector plate variant will look a bit spacier but as your trains lengths are limited by the length of the larger sector plate.
ReplyDeletePointless layouts are ... pointless IMO :-)
If you put two APAs side by side you might even be to do H0 - especially if you decide to use shorter, stubbier "toy-grade" switches.
But this is just me ...
Christian
Yes I agree the first option is much better. It probably needs a 5ft by 2ft board to become practical in EM, but that would still be a one board layout. I will play around with Templot when I have a spare six weeks.
DeleteGenerally I agree with you about pointless layouts, but I'm beginning to wonder if the two sector plate scheme is actually the one I should have built as an Apa project, whether in N or EM. The advantage it has is that it is wholly self contained yet operable, and could I suspect be built as a 3-2-2 version of an Inglenook puzzle. In which case the siding at the front could possibly, in HO/OO at least, be served by a real point and still fit in the space. The second sector plate is a bit of a gimmick - and a bit more trial and error suggests it needs to be a traverser not a sector plate - but would add just a touch more flexibility.
Incidentally the Peco loco lift could just about be butchered with care to provide both the sector plate and the traverser as long as the Sentinel is the biggest loco used. I suspect the common small industrial o-4-0 diesels - the Judith Edge 48DS and the Roxey Howard would also both fit.